Every year, merchants and buyers alike get excited about the prospect of En Primeur, even in lesser vintages – for merchants, an opportunity to go and try the new wines that the Chateaux have spent the past year working hard on producing, chatting to the owners about the vintage; its difficulties and challenges, and then trying to gain an understanding of it all.

For buyers, it’s an opportunity to listen to what their merchants have to say about the wines, and hopefully pick up some well-priced wines that won’t be ready for two years at least. Sadly, this year, despite the early pressure for a sensible and quick campaign, things seem to have taken a turn for the worse on this rainy Monday afternoon in London – and as such, we felt compelled to put together a short list on how we might run a Bordeaux campaign…

• Cheap releases are the way forward, otherwise buyers will quit En Primeur altogether. People traditionally buy En Primeur because it is cheaper than buying the wines that are already available. There would be no point in buying something that is not available for two years, (and even once available cannot be drunk for another 5 at least) unless it is significantly cheaper than those wines that are available already with similar reviews.

• Release early, and get ahead of the game – if better wines are releasing before you, it is too late. Merchants will not offer wines if they come out at the same time as better wines, with similar prices. There has been ample time available for the Petit Chateaux to release in the previous four weeks – doing it on the same day as Lynch Bages makes no sense!

• Don’t all come out at the same time!! How can merchants keep buyers interested with an offer every minute!? Spread them out…

• Do not undermine those trying to sell your wines. Merchants do not like being told that the pricing structure is okay (Cos), when it clearly isn’t. Although Bordeaux have been making wine for a long time, the merchants have been selling it just as long – if they claim a price isn’t right, it probably isn’t.

• Don’t build the future price into current releases. If the price moves up in the future, so be it – it does so because it has age and provenance – if you want to do this, follow Latour’s example and quit En Primeur. If you would like people to buy something that hasn’t been made yet, make it worth their while.

 

Undoubtedly there will be good value on some of the better wines during this campaign, which we’ve already seen from Pontet Canet amongst others, and we will be sure to point these wines out as and when they are available. In the meantime, we’re working on a fantastic offer for some back vintages that have managed to escape Bordeaux and where pricing remains sensible for the quality of the wines – to follow shortly…

Chateau Latour, the illustrious Bordeaux 1^st Growth, has announced that 2011 will be the last vintage to be released En Primeur.

This is big news, as for the first time since the 1960’s, a First Growth Chateau breaks with the unique and over time very successful way that Bordeaux sells its newest wines.

Why would Latour do this? What are the reasons behind this decision? What are the implications? Here are our thoughts.

First of all, being Fine Wine Merchants, this is a tricky subject. Our blog is widely read. By consumers, by fellow wine merchants, by the French Negociants and even by the Chateaux. Their interests are not always aligned and taking position could have repercussions on our ability to work with them. To illustrate that, it is very telling to see how few players in the market are willing to go on record.  However, Latour’s decision to stop selling its wine En Primeur is too big a thing to stay silent about and loyal readers and customers won’t be surprised to see that we tell it as we see it. Moreover, we side with the end consumer: if it’s right for the person who buys the wines we sell, it’s right for us and it should be right for all other actors in the distribution chain.

Chateau Latour is owned by François Pinault, who runs the PPR retail empire. PPR, previously known as Pinault-Printemps-Redoute, owns luxury brands like Gucci, Yves St Laurent and Puma and additionally is involved in other luxury goods and sports brands. PPR is also involved in online retailing, in a wide variety of products. They have financial muscle and they understand retailing luxury goods. Moreover, PPR is a big corporate business. It’s fair to assume that the reasoning behind the move to quit the En Primeur system must be that Mr Pinault expects it to be better for PPR, ultimately maximizing its profits. Even though Latour say it’s all about selling their wine when it’s ready to drink and about “killing” speculation.

 

The En Primeur system

In its simplest form, the En Primeur system means that Chateaux sell wine from the barrel, years before it’s ready to be drunk and 2 years before it will be delivered to customers. It’s sold at a discount, in return for cash up front, which allows the Chateaux to finance the next crop. That was the original thinking behind the En Primeur concept.

However, if you have enough cash, why would you sell your wines En Primeur?

If Latour’s decision is indeed just about no longer selling En Primeur – which I’m not convinced about – what are the implications? Let’s look at the effect on price first. Let’s presume Latour decides to release 6 years after the harvest, instead of one year. Even though they might have enough cash to be able to do that, it doesn’t mean that cash is free. So, assuming the cost of money to be 5%, releasing 5 years later means costs have gone up 28%. Releasing after 5 years, at 28% more, wouldn’t make financial sense as the returns for Latour would be the same. Possibly even less because of the need for added storage facilities. Add to that the risk of price fluctuations and most likely – all other things being equal – Latour would have to price at 28% plus. Furthermore, they’d also want to receive a premium for holding the stock and controlling supply, because otherwise the whole exercise IMHO just doesn’t make sense.

How that translates into consumer prices remains to be seen. Perhaps it would do away with unsustainable, speculation fueled price hikes. Perhaps prices would stay the same as they are now. In either case though, the profits would be for Latour and not for the (speculating) consumer.

Moreover, the EP system is a bit more complicated then described above, as it has also morphed into an allocation system, effectively securing demand for the Chateaux. This has provided tremendous value to the Chateaux over the years, as they can “force” buyers into purchasing something they don’t necessarily want (for fear of not being able to get access to it in the years to come) whilst charging extremely high prices in the sought after vintages. This is particularly valuable when vintages are harder to sell and not something you do away with lightly. Therefore, Latour abandoning En Primeur makes people think there’s more going on than what is being communicated.

 

Is this just about quitting En Primeur?

For example, it could also spell the end for Latour selling through “le Place de Bordeaux”, with its allocation system, couldn’t it? Not necessarily so. It’s important to understand that Latour quitting EP doesn’t mean they will abandon selling through “le Place”. Indeed, Latour have communicated that they won’t. If that’s true, then Latour can still release stock into the market using “Le Place” and allocations, but would have achieved a higher return than before. This system could also exist for drinkable vintages only, provided there’s enough of an incentive for merchants that sell on the public.

So, all good then. Latour only wants their wine to hit the market when it’s ready to drink. They want to get rid of speculation and they will continue using the current distribution network.

 

The way Latour is distributed

Not quite. As mentioned, there is a strong sense that this is not just about quitting EP. Latour has been awkward with Negociants for a long time and has been courting big buyers directly. For years, they have released very little stock onto the market ( at high prices) and seem to have been preparing themselves to restructure the distribution of their wine. Many people expect the move to quit EP to be the start of a bigger plan. But again, the official communication does not support that.

Our guess is that Latour ultimately want to take charge of distribution, of the way its wines are sold, in order to maximize its profits. Ultimately, Chateau Latour would like to control the supply chain. Quite like some other luxury goods empires, who are very successful at it. Take for example LVMH, a rival of PPR and owner of Moet & Chandon and Hennessy Cognac. LVMH spends a lot of effort and money in controlling where their products are being sold. If for example prices in the UK are lower than in Japan, they will try and make sure that international traders don’t use the price gap to supply cheaper stock to Japan and in doing so potentially lower the price in Japan. LVMH want the price gap to remain and pocket the difference themselves. LVMH are very good at this.

Think of it, if you have a brand as strong as Latour, why would you let 3^rd parties share in the profits if not necessary? You could do it all yourself. In fact, you are already doing it yourself, just not with this particular brand that you own. Why not cut out the courtiers (which would save 2%)? Why not cut out the Bordeaux Negociants (which would save 15 to 20%)? Why not cut out the International Wine Merchants (which would save another 10 to 15%) and go straight to their customers? Indeed, there are very persistent rumors that direct selling is already happening. Or even, why not cut them out as well and open your own retail stores?

But what about the bad vintages, critics might argue. How would Latour sell those if not through EP and “Le Place”? Could they get the same uptake, at the same price? It would be less forced, that’s for sure – which is a very good thing. It would be more consumer driven, which is good as well.  Yes, there would be a risk there for Latour, but if they can control supply and pricing, that risk surely is manageable. Particularly if Latour would throw some allocations to the Negociants, or big International Merchants, who would be starved for Latour. Or even discount it in their stores. After all, there would be a margin to play with.

 

Will others follow?

Already, there is massive speculation about what the other Chateaux will do. At the same time, it’s clear that, even if they wanted to abandon the EP system, only the biggest names could as smaller Chateaux simply don’t have the cash. But could this be viable for the bigger names? As stated above, you’d have to have the financial muscle to forego at least 5 years of cash flow. You’d also need to be reasonably sure that customers want to buy your wine without the added benefit of the traditional reasons (EP and secured allocations), now but also in the years to come.

Regarding the other, unconfirmed option of leaving “Le Place” altogether, that’s an even harder challenge, as you would need to be able to control distribution. There aren’t many Chateaux that tick those boxes.

 

What does it mean if I just want to drink the stuff?

It will certainly improve provenance. It will probably mean Latour will be even harder to buy. Regarding price, that remains to be seen. Hopefully it will benefit drinkers, but our feeling is that if winemakers start to behave like the luxury goods empires that in some cases own them, it’s not in the interest of the end consumer. Surely increased control by the brand owner is not done just to protect the interest of the consumer.

Does this affect your decision to purchase Latour 2011 En Primeur? Clearly, you won’t buy it to safeguard future allocations, so the rationale to buy Latour will have to be that you love it and you like the opportunity to, for the last time, buy it now, En Primeur, years before you can drink it, because it works out cheaper.

 

Afterthought

Let’s hope we are being too cynical. Let’s hope this is just about what Latour communicates, which is that they would like to supply the market with the best Latour they can possibly make, ready to drink and with perfect provenance. 

"The cost of a premier grand cru like Chateau Lafite-Rothschild '82 is nearly $58/ bottle. The public simply won't pay this. I think that a crash is inevitable". Steven Spurrier, Time Magazine, 1985

The Lafite 1982 now sells at around £40,000/ case.

No matter what the current situation on the fine wine market is – there is one simple truth, and that is it is reasonable to assume that regardless of the fine wine market’s invariable day-to-day fluctuations, its prices will continue to move upwards.

As the prices move up, interest in buying wine as a commodity will also increase. As wine is a finite product that does get drunk – the value of high scoring wines will inevitably increase.

The price movement on Smith Haut Lafitte 2009 after Parker awarded it 100 points – Courtesy FRW

As I have mentioned on previous occasions, prior to Robert Parkers re- ratings of the 2009’s, the cheapest 100 point red Bordeaux was the Pavie 2000 at around £4,000/ case. There are now several wines from the 2009 vintage with 100 points at significantly lower prices than this. These prices will not hold for long – and the same will apply to the 2010’s when they are re-rated later this year or early next.

Right now however, the market seems to have bottomed, and there are many good opportunities to buy before the Bordeaux 2011 campaign kicks off, as this campaign may push prices up further. 

Vieux Chateau Certan – one of the best wines of 2011?

We have put together a list from the 2000 vintage onwards showing all 1855 classified wines, the top wines of Graves, Pomerol and St Emilion, and key second wines too – along with their current average market price, and Parker scores – this list is incredibly useful in identifying those wines which represent great potential for investment, and those that look hugely undervalued in terms of drinking wines too.

Listed below are some of our tips from this list that still look a steal when considering their price/ vintage and score, along with a link to a selection of the full list (there is too much information for us to publish here, but if you would like more information on the full list, please download the list here or get in touch). If you compare these to different vintages of the same Chateau, or the same vintage and points of differing Châteaux, they look incredibly good value. So much so that it will not be long before consumers recognise the most obvious bargains and act!

This will be updated as the 2011’s are released – but expect market prices to move up on some of the highlights as listed below as the campaign moves on. We will be able to offer most of the wines from the full list, so please do ask if you have any interest.

 

2010

Lafite Rothschild

Haut Brion

Pontet Canet

Pichon Baron

Leoville Lascases

Lynch Bages

Eglise Clinet

Latour

Montrose

Brane Cantenac

d’Issan

Ducru Beaucaillou

Grand Puy Lacoste

Gruaud Larose

La Chapelle Ausone

La Lagune

Lafon Rochet

Larcis Ducasse

Lascombes

Latour a Pomerol

Le Bon Pasteur

Le Gay

Leoville Poyferre

l’Evangile

Malescot St Exupery

Saint Pierre

Smith Haut Lafitte

 

2009

Petit Haut Lafitte (2^nd wine of Smith HL)

Clos Fourtet

Poyferre

Pontet Canet

Smith Haut Lafitte

Beausejour Becot

Beausejour Duffau Lagarosse

Branaire Ducru

Ducru Beaucaillou

Gruaud Larose

La Gaffeliere

Larcis Ducasse

Saint Pierre

Smith Haut Lafitte

Pavie

 

2008

Lynch Bages

Haut Bailly

Pichon Baron

Pontet Canet

Montrose

La Fleur Petrus

Pavie Macquin

Troplong

Trotanoy

 

Others to look at

Latour 2000

Latour 2003

Cos Estournel 2005

La Mission Haut Brion 2000

Leoville Las Cases 2000

Las Cases 2002

Malescot 2005

Margaux 2000

Montrose 2000

VCC 2006

 

Enjoy!

After a short but very informative and useful trip, here are some of our observations regarding the new vintage and upcoming En Primeur campaign.

We have tasted lots of wines ourselves, we have been following tweets and blogs by other wine merchants and have read the reports published by wine reviewers and journalists. The conclusion is that 2011 is not a great vintage, although better than feared. It’s also a heterogeneous vintage, with some very good to exceptional but also rather poor wines. Selection therefore will be crucial this year. Whites and particularly Sauternes and Barsac however are exceptionally good in 2011 and represent a fantastic buying opportunity.

It must be said that the winemakers, in a lot of cases, have done a fantastic job in making very good wines when nature had not dealt them a good hand. It must be heart breaking for Chateau owners to work very hard for a year only for the international “critics” and merchants to show up and slack off their wine. The wine made in Bordeaux nowadays is invariably better than it was 15 years ago.

Speaking of the weather, there have been rather extreme conditions, with severe drought and very high temperatures in spring, hail and 2 days of 40 degrees in late June (see here for more detail). This has resulted in low yields, small berries and an early harvest. Chateau Margaux for example reported the lowest yields since 1991, the smallest berries ever (!) and the earliest harvest since 1893.

Chateau Margaux

There is a plethora of vintage reports available online. Therefore, let it suffice for now to say that in a nutshell, the best appellations for Red seem to be St Julien and Pomerol with weather conditions most favorable for clay based Merlot. Whites and particularly Sauternes and Barsac are exceptionally good. The consensus seems to be that this vintage (for red) is of a quality comparable to 2001 and 2008, perhaps just behind them. To give you an idea of where that leaves 2011 in a ranking of all vintages since 2000, have a look at this:

 

Left Bank:  10,09,05,00,08,06,04,03,01,02,07

Right Bank:  10,09,00,05,08,01,06,04,07,03,02

Courtesy of Vinalytics, this ranking is derived at by taking aggregate scores from a spread of reviewers looking at approximately 250 Châteaux.

 

Seeing this is not a must-buy vintage (except for Whites and Stickies), pricing and the speed with which the En Primeur campaign is conducted will be all important to make 2011 sell. The Chateaux recognize this and promise price reductions and a quick campaign. Nevertheless, given pricing in recent history, Courtiers and Negociants are not convinced at all that Chateaux owners will reduce prices enough. Negociants and secondary trade are nervous about being forced into taking allocations that could ruin them if they can’t sell them through quickly enough. So far, 2011 has not attracted a lot of interest. Although reportedly, there were more badges issued by the UGC during the En Primeur week, reports from Chateaux and various attendants suggest there was considerably less interest, particularly from Asia.

Prices therefore need to come down severely to have a chance to sell this vintage. If they do, it might sell well as many very good wines have been made and the vintage does present an opportunity to get or increase your allocation of your favorite wines. If they don’t it will be a very disappointing campaign and a missed opportunity.

On our way to the fabulous party at Gruaud Larose

So that leaves the question by how much need prices come down? The answer should be simple: prices need to be at a level where consumers can buy 2011 at a discount compared to similar and physically available vintages. We have already reported that for 3 of the 5 First Growths, this would mean they need to reduce their price by 57% as compared to 2010. The same calculations can be made for each wine, with reductions depending on the quality of their 2011, their pricing in 2010 as well as prices of comparable back vintages.

Will that happen? Let’s hope so because at the right price, there are some delicious wines out there well worth filling up your cellar with. So far the spread in prices I have heard is massive, ranging from €300 per bottle ex Negociant for Lafite Rothschild to no less than Sylvie Cazes (president of the UGC) saying that  10-15% down on 2010 should be enough.

Finally, there is a good chance the campaign will start very soon, possibly even next week. Most expect it to finish before Vinexpo at the end of May. And it might be kicked off by a First Growth. So get yourself ready! We will contact our subscribers and customers early next week to gauge interest. If you are not yet a customer, please get in touch. We have allocations for you and we are always very competitively priced.

We will be sharing our best buys as the campaign progresses. Make sure to check our blog for updates and do follow @DittonWineTrade on Twitter. It will allow you to stay on top of breaking news and releases, often before it's available anywhere else. Search (and use) #bdx11 to see who else is tweeting about Bordeaux 2011. Or just phone us if that's too geeky for you.

The Bordeaux 2011 En Primeur campaign will start shortly. Next week, the trade will go and taste the wines but this week, several wine critics have already done so. Robert Parker, who said on Twitter that he had no interest in the 2011 vintage before going out to Bordeaux, has also tasted the new vintage. On his blog, Parker said that "the 2011 is better than expected. It's close to both 2001 and 2008 in overall quality". Other tasters seem to confirm this.

There is also a lot of speculation on pricing. The consensus amongst consumers and trade is that prices will need to come down a lot in order for Bordeaux 2011 to have a chance of selling. The Chateaux agree that prices need to come down but at this stage won't be drawn into saying by how much.

The basic rule for En Primeur pricing is that it needs to be cheaper than comparable, physically available vintages. There has to be an incentive for consumers to buy something that they can't drink for a good few years. With that in mind, we make an attempt at establishing the price levels of the 2011 First Growths.

Below you'll find a table with the last 11 vintages of the 5 First Growths, their RP scores and current UK prices.

We then focus on 2001, 2002, 2004, 2007 and 2008 as being the vintages that will likely compare best with 2011. We have calculated the average price and average score for each of the First Growths, for those 5 vintages:

We feel this "basket" of "average" vintages would be a fair proxy for 2011. Assuming that the consumer would be tempted to purchase 2011 if it comes at a 10% discount compared to the basket, we then have target consumer prices. Please see below. 

Finally, using normal margins for the trade, the Negociants and the Chateaux, we arrive at the release price for the 2011. Below, we have used the price ex Negociant, as this is the most widely quoted and comparable price. 

So there we have it. If we have the consumer in mind – which we all should do and never not – prices need to come down by 57% for Mouton, Margaux and Latour and by 64% for Haut Brion. The only exception is Lafite, for which 8% would be enough. If you think 57% is a lot, then bear in mind that €260 a bottle is double the release price of the 2008.

You might also want to have a look at the Liv-ex blog, where you'll find a similar analysis although it arrives at different conclusions.

Make sure to follow our blog for updates and do follow @DittonWineTrade on Twitter. It will allow you to stay on top of breaking news and releases, often before it's available anywhere else. Search (and use) #bdx11 to see who else is tweeting about Bordeaux 2011. Or just phone us if that's too geeky for you.

 

Denis Dubourdieu is a professor at the University of Bordeaux and a top oenologist. He is also a consultant, scientist, owner and wine maker of Doisy Daene and Clos Floridene. He is very well positioned to comment on the quality of  the 2011 Bordeaux vintage, or at least on the prevailing climatic conditions that largely dictate what the individual winemakers at the various Chateaux can work with.

 

 

Courtesy of Pierre-Eric Sabatier of Cordier Mestrezat, one of the main Bordeaux Negociants, we are pleased to share with you Professor Dubourdieu's report on Bordeaux 2011. It is an exceptionally detailed report, across the regions, of all the major conditions that determine the quality of a vintage. 

Do read it and draw your own conclusions but in a nutshell, here are Denis' conclusions: "Astonishing dry white wines, less even quality for red wines than in 2009 or 2010, but many excellent and great Sauternes and Barsac" 

The UGC tastings are in just over 2 weeks and it is expected that the Bordeaux 2011 En Primeur campaign will kick off shortly after, possibly with the 1st Growths coming out first.

As of yet, there is not much buzz around this new vintage but that wil likely change. Having said that, Robert Parker will go out to Bordeaux next week to taste the barrel samples. If we have to believe his rather controversial, unprofessional and SHOUTING message on Twitter yesterday, he's not terribly excited: "HEADING BACK TO BORDEAUX NEXT WEEK TO TASTE 2011s-ABSOLUTELY NO INTEREST IN THIS VINTAGE IF MY instincts are correct". But let's not go there, that is a story in itself.

Make sure to follow our blog for updates and do follow @DittonWineTrade on Twitter. It will allow you to stay on top of breaking news and releases, often before it's available anywhere else. Search (and use) #bdx11 to see who else is tweeting about Bordeaux 2011. Or just phone us if that's too geeky for you.

Enjoy the report. 

They were expected to be high, but the 2009 scores released on March 1 by Robert Parker have exceeded the highest expectations.

 

"Not a myth but mythical" is Parker's subtitle for his Bordeaux 2009 review. Indeed. He goes on to say "In short, 2009 is the greatest vintage I have tasted in Bordeaux since 1982". He backs this up by awarding no less than 18 Bordeaux reds, and 1 white, the perfect score of 100 points.

 

 

To put the number of 18 in perspective, have a look at below table, that lists the 100 pointers of the most successful vintages since 1982, 

 

Robert Parker's most successful vintages

1982	6
1996	1
2000	6
2003	3
2005	2
2009	18

 

2009 boasts an astonishing number of perfect scores. Is this Parker's farewell, to complete the cycle that he started in 1982 (the vintage that made him), never to be surpassed? Here's the full list, including the "barrel" score:

 

Parker's 2009 Bordeaux 100 pointers

wine	bottle	barrel
Beausejour Duffau Lagarosse	100	96-98
Bellevue Mondot	100	95-100
Clinet	100	97-100
Clos Fourtet	100	95-98
Cos d'Estournel	100	98-100
Ducru Beaucaillou	100	96-98
L'Evangile	100	96-100
Haut Brion	100	96-100
La Mission Haut Brion	100	98-100
La Mondotte	100	95-98
Latour	100	98-100
Le Pin	100	95-98
Leoville Poyferre	100	97-100
Montrose	100	96-100
Pavie	100	96-100
Petrus	100	96-100
Pontet Canet	100	97-100
Smith Haut Lafitte	100	96-98

 

From barrel, Parker awarded 21 wines a potential 100 points. Out of these 21, 12 indeed received full marks. The remaining 9 got at least 98. Interestingly, there were also 6 wines that got upgraded to the perfect score whilst the barrel score range did not reach 100 (see above).

Looking beyond the top scoring Chateaux, there are an incredible number of wines that score 95 points or more, many of which make unbelievable value for money. Do revisit our list – once we have had the time, we will be offering some of those gems that are a must buy to drink.

 

Bordeaux 2009 scoring 95 plus (reds only)

99	11
98	14
97	6
96	10
95	16

 

It goes too far, in this blogpost, to list all of the above wines. I would urge you though to get in touch with us – some of these 95-99 pointers represent the best buys.

Although there had been substantial price movements prior to Parker releasing his scores, it goes without saying that there were massive price hikes when the scores came out. Particularly for the 100 pointers, on which below table focusses. It needs to be pointed out though that the "after" prices might still change significantly, as the market has yet to find its new prices. The "prior" prices are as of the day before the new scores came out, the "after" prices are as of today (March 3rd). 

 

2009 movers and shakers

Wine	prior	after	% change
Beausejour Duffau Lagarosse	£1,000	£2,400	140%
Clos Fourtet	£750	£1,800	140%
Smith Haut Lafitte	£680	£1,600	135%
Clinet	£1,500	£2,200	47%
Le Pin	£18,000	£25,000	39%
Montrose	£1,900	£2,550	34%
Leoville Poyferre	£1,350	£1,800	33%
Pontet Canet	£1,350	£1,800	33%
L'Evangile	£2,300	£2,750	20%
La Mondotte	£2,550	£3,000	18%
Petrus	£25,000	£29,000	16%
Cos d'Estournel	£2,800	£3,200	14%
Pavie	£2,200	£2,500	14%
Ducru Beaucaillou	£2,000	£2,200	10%
Haut Brion	£7,400	£8,000	8%
Bellevue Mondotte	£2,550	£2,750	8%
La Mission Haut Brion	£5,600	£6,000	7%
Latour	£11,700	£11,800	1%

 

Are these prices the right prices? Overshooting? Underperforming? Is the fine wine market efficient enough to quickly adjust to the new information, or is there scope for arbitrage? What is the right price level for a 100 pointer? Nobody knows, really. And that's why there's an enormous amount of trading going on. Taking position, selling on the hype, holding on, buying with a long term view – it's all part of the spiel. There will be a lot more analyses done to determine the new values, now that Bob has spoken. Do get in touch if you would like to hear our views. Views based on trading these wines daily – we know what's going on.

There are quite a few wine critics that publicly proclaim Parker has lost his marbles. However, none of them have the track record that Parker has and none of them have the influence that Parker has. Therefore, we can safely ignore what they say, when it comes to the effect on pricing. 

When it comes to drinking, you will have to choose which wine reviewer is most aligned with your personal taste. Bordeaux 2009 is a unique vintage, and has just been awarded stardom, so if you were planning on buying some, do so now before prices are out of reach. There are many, many wines that should be part of your cellar.

 

 

After 6 months of continuous falls in price, the market now seems to have turned a corner. The Liv-ex 50 has stopped its decline and is indeed edging back up.

 

On a longer and more important timescale, this is reflected in the Liv-ex 100 as well:

 

Overall, there has been a lot more activity and trade. It started a bit cautiously, but by now demand for selective wines is quite robust. Whereas last year and even in January, one could pick up top scoring Bordeaux at discounted prices, this is now increasingly difficult.

We reported brisk trade in January, with Bordeaux 1st Growths returning to center stage. This trend is continuing and indeed strenghtening: the best 1st Growths as well as 1st Growths below £3,000 are in demand.

Liv-ex have reported that trading volumes during the last 6 months of last year were low. In other words: the price drop that we saw in that period was carried by a relatively small amount of sales. Much lower than in 2008. In my opinion, that supports the view that we might see a slow return to the prices seen in the first half of last year.

Other trends to note are:

– we seem to be back to traditional names and better vintages. Brand as such is no longer good enough. "cheap" Bordeaux is in demand, yes, but contrary to popular belief, "expensive" Bordeaux is far from dead.

–  At the same time, Burgundy and Italy continue to do well, as does the Rhone. There is an ongoing trend where buy-to-drink demand looks for value beyond Bordeaux. How right too.

 

To conclude: the real buzz at the moment is with Bordeaux 2009. Robert Parker's bottle scores are imminent (allegedly to be released on the 29th of February). As you know, they are expected to be extremely high, as Parker himself has tweeted that 2009 is the greatest vintage he has ever tasted. This has led to frantic positioning by the trade and very strong demand from our private customers, who love the vintage for drinking pleasure and for investment. Fortunately, not all 2009 prices have gone up – there are still numerous fantastic wines to be had that present quite extraordinary value for money. 

Everybody's now waiting for you Mr Parker. 

As you will know from our previous blogposts, the EU and India have been trying to reach consensus on signing a Free Trade Agreement, which could have a significant impact on the (fine) wine industry. Hopes were high that, after 4 years of negotiating, an agreement would be signed last week.

It hasn't. Since this FTA covers a very wide range of industries and is highly political, it would seem the hurdles were still too high. The negotiating parties have not yet got what they want. In particular the car-manufactoring industry as well as generic drug manufacture seem to be the major, remaining obstacles.

Indian Commerce Minister Anand Sharma said the talks were in the "final stage" but a "few gaps" remained. EU Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said that both sides expected the agreement to be signed by the Autumn and Herman van Rompuy, the European Council President said the EU and Indian leaders have made "substantial progress" towards a free trade agreement. 

To illustrate how difficult it is to reach consensus, and how political this process is, even issues not directly related to mutual trade were considered. As a prime example, the Iranian issue was raised, with the EU pressing India to be more supportive towards the EU trade sanctions on Iran. 

The bottom, rather frustrating, line: we will have to wait and see if and when this hugely promising FTA will (finally) be signed.

In the meantime, it will be interesting to watch what the big players in the fine wine business will do. Will they take a gamble and establish a foothold before anybody else does? 

 

Can we expect a boom in Indian fine wine imports?

 

A recent FT article discussed wine in India, for which Ditton Wine Traders provided a lot of the research.  The interpretation of the potential for significant developments for fine wine in India left us and other trade actors, British or India, who contributed their views and analysis a little underwhelmed. We feel important aspects we’re not covered , so we’ve decided to elaborate further here. 

India is developing into an open market economy, though important remnants of the autarkic policies that followed independence remain.  For example, fine wine is constrained by a penal import tariff regime of 150%. 

This could change as the EU and India are in the final stages of negotiating a Free Trade Agreement (FTA), negotiations for which have started in 2007.  

Findings show there is arguably a 50-50 chance of a tariff reduction to be announced at the EU-India Annual Summit, February 10^th.  It may appear to hang in the balance, but Indian officials indicate they are prepared to make concessions within the framework of the EU. It is the single most significant piece of news ever in relation to India and wine, and the only development that could potentially lead to India fulfilling its potential as a mass importer of wine. 

 

Will the EU-India FTA be signed?

India has FTA’s with some 60 countries, yet that on the table with the EU is both its most ambitious and difficult.  The two sides have met some 14 times since initiating talks in 2007 and, it appears, are working towards a significant statement in time for the February summit. 

“The potential (for wine) is tremendous, the ingredients are all there; wine is a cultural pursuit, an intellectual pursuit, India is an old culture, an old culture can better assimilate the traditions of another, it can be imbibed by the Indian population.  The Middle class has grown up on a surfeit of education, it can reach out to,” affirms Sanjay Menon, owner of pioneering fine wine importers, Sansula.

Annual trade between the EU and India stands at $75 billion (£48 billion) (2009/2010), making the EU India’s most important trading partner.  Beyond the trade-off between tariff reduction for EU exports and protection of Indian industries, notably automobiles and India’s fledgling domestic wine market, there are real issues behind the 5-year impasse.  India wants access to EU markets through free movement of its professional émigres, highly sensitive for much of the EU. The EU meanwhile demands stronger implementation of Intellectual Property Protection for its transnational pharmaceutical industry.

Yet, the FTA is seen by both parties as too big to fall, negotiations have already reached the highest political levels before diplomats have had a chance to thrash out the details, a diplomatic blunder placing pressure to agree.  Still, the fact that they are negotiating shows there are no guarantees.

 

What would agreement mean for fine wine markets?

There is no hard data on fine wine in India, as the market is beginning and under the radar (see below for upcoming blog pieces on Indian position towards fine wine and wine investment).  However, analysis by Peter Wilkinson, Director of International Affairs for the Scotch Whisky Association, is instructive.

“If we look at spirits, member-states would not sign-up on the basis of less than a 50% reduction”, observes Wilkinson.  India’s 150,000 9l case market (firm figures remain elusive) in imported wine (compare to China’s 2.5 million case market in Bordeaux alone) is growing at 12% per annum while spirits is around 15%.  “A 50% reduction of the current rate might increase growth to about 20%-25% per annum”, he concludes.

However, continues Wilkinson, “the EU may try to secure a fair bit of front-loading as part of the deal, looking for a significant chunk of the total concession to be given over with immediate effect, with the remainder brought in within an agreed timeframe.” 

Significantly, for fine wines, both the EU and India have indicated progress in the area of staggered tariffs for different quality-price levels of wine.  Leaving the current fiscal position intact for value entry-point wines, while progressively reducing duty on higher-priced ones, the lowest tariff strata would, therefore, be applied to fine wines.  This compromise would protect the development of the nascent and successful domestic Indian Wine industry, yet open the way for fine wines to reach India’s burgeoning middle class – the world’s largest.

 

How would the market respond?

Would we see an explosion in fine wine markets like what occurred with the 2008 decision of the Hong Kong government to reduce tariffs from 50% to 0% overnight?  

Not in ways comparable to Hong Kong. Implementation, to be in line with peer-countries in the EU, Brazil, Russia or China to eventually 20%-25%, would likely be at stages over a period of 5 – 10 years.  In the immediate-term however, the FTA could reduce the special tariff of 150% to 80%-90% for wines and spirits (the maximum standard excise duty within the bounds of the World Trade Organisation).

Yet, the Hong Kong precedent is in some ways comparable, by way of human behaviour.  “The effect of halving the tariff on a society accustomed to 150% would be palpable.  The market would react in ways not previously seen”, asserts Rajiv Singhal, Director Fine Publishing India and Ambassador to Champagne trade body, CIVC.

India will not be in a position to support falling prices or take up slack from over-supplied markets.  Nevertheless, agreement would radically alter the entire outlook and dynamise the wine trade globally.  The moment would be firmly behind India realising its potential as a major actor in the world of wine by entering the global market place.  It would be fascinating and mark the continued expansion of fine wine markets to a new and more global clientele.

We will find out more in just a few weeks.

In upcoming blog pieces we examine the nascent Indian fine wine market and, significantly, culture around fine and rare wines and wine investment, in particular in comparison to China.  Drawing on the experiences of peers and other trade actors – both Indian and British, pioneering a culture of wine in India.

Watch this space and feel free to share views. Follow us on Twitter @DittonWineTrade and join the debate online at #IndiaEUFTA

There's a new wine blog. And this one is different.

 

12x75 centers around interviews with well known people in the wine world, people who the owner of the blog admires. Under the motto "taking the stuffiness out the Fine Wine Market", 12x75 has a light and often humorous approach. I can highly recommend it. So far, Stephen Browett (Farr Vintners), Doug Rumsam (Bordeaux Index) and Adon Kumar (Wine-Searcher) feature. Knowing the author, rest assured you'll see more big names being interviewed. 

 Well, mostly big names as the latest interview is with yours truly.